People who reach the top of any high-stakes game are rarely well-rounded in the conventional sense.
There’s a genuinely insightful theory of technological change hiding in here. It loses me when one temperament winning under one technological environment becomes evidence of superiority rather than right traits, right place, right time.
Where do you think I imply superiority ? And of which temperament ?
There’s a genuinely insightful theory of technological change hiding in here. It loses me when one temperament winning under one technological environment becomes evidence of superiority rather than right traits, right place, right time.
Where do you think I imply superiority ? And of which temperament ?